if we are –
if being is
what we do
then how
do we do
what we are?
imagine Ourself
as Pure Singleness –
prior to our existence
as things of spatiality
temporality
gravitation
& light
why would there be a
necessity for the
pure singleness of
ourself to exist
as things of
space time
gravity and light?
prior to our being real –
pure singleness is our
actual state
we are the condition
of pure singleness
which understands
itself as being real
but for pure singleness
of ourself
there is no
actual reality
there is no time and space
or gravitation or light –
no thing exists
there is only otherness
we ourself are
the pure singleness
of otherness
so to try and answer
our question in part 1
existence is the understanding
of otherness –
which is always ourself
there is no thing
there is only otherness
for pure singleness
of otherness
difference has no meaning
difference
is our understanding
of ourself –
we differentiate
differentiate
pure singleness of otherness
into a universe of two
for the different
constituent others
of such a binary alter-verse
there is no possibility
of existence as
a singleness
each owes its existence
entirely to the other
each stands under the other
in complete obligation
for its own otherness
each understands
the other
as itself
but a binary alter-verse
– a bi-verse –
is actually an impossibility
because we ourself are always
a third other that
differentiates between
– that understands –
two others…
just as we ourself
are always one of two others
being differentiated
by a third which understands us
therefore the simplest
alter-versal arrangement
is an entanglement of three others –
a tri-verse
tri-versal entanglement is the
basic differential arrangement –
the basis of all more complex
alter-versal entanglements
for example a quadri-versal
entanglement of four others
is based on four tri-verses
a quinti-versal
entanglement of five others
is based on ten tri-verses
a hexa-versal
entanglement of six others
is based on fourteen tri-verses
a hepta-versal
entanglement of seven others
is based on forty-nine tri-verses
and so on
differential understanding is always tri-versal
& the basis of any complex alter-verse
is the symmetrical otherness of three
we differentiate
the pure singleness of otherness
as ‘other different from other’
but by doing so, we also differentiate
ourself from those two others
this symmetry of three
is the elementary moment
of any tri-verse
but we cannot understand
the impossible singleness
of those two different others,
even although, with us, they form
the elementary symmetry of a tri-verse
rather, as a moment of realisation,
we simply grasp them together,
comprehending them, as ‘a them’
– from which ‘a myself’ is different
myself understands its
constitutional difference
with them, as a moment
of spacing from the other
‘space’ as such
is the infinite degree
of momentary realisations
of myself being spaced…
…as the basis for an infinity
of complex alter-verses
that exist between ourself and our horizons
as the moment of realisation,
myself differentiates its own
pure singleness of otherness
as an ‘i am different from you’
but myself does not realise that the ‘you’
from which it appears to be spatially different,
is actually its own constitution –
those very others with which
it constitutes a tri-versal symmetry…
…indeed, its comprehending of them is limited
by the fact that they actually constitute
its comprehending of them –
its consciousness of the universe
but in this moment of difference,
myself realises itself as an
impossible singleness – as
myself-void-otherness
and therefore must always already
be re-differentiating its
otherness from those others.
this process of momentary and
instant re-differentiation of myself
is the phenomenon of ‘time’
time is the continuing re-alteration
of a tri-verse, and is common
only to its constituents –
no time actually passes
for pure singleness of otherness