So far we have been considering temporality as a theoretical structure for the absolute singleness of understanding – our state prior to being things in space and time. We have postulated that for singularity which is not absolutely nothing, there is a dynamic – a moment of actuation for which each other is constituted wholly as the others. But in doing so each other be-comes actuated as the actual prior state of the others, and has no means of comprehending them in a way that can distinguish between them. It cannot tell what it’s own constituents are, because it is as them. – Otherness Ourself can only grasp that it is exterior to a certain otherness. It cannot tell that inasmuch as it itself is a constituent of what the others already are, it comprehends itself as being-different from itself – a ‘Myself’ which is different from and exterior to its ownmost otherness.
However, Myself has be-come an impossible singularity, exterior to the absolute singleness of understanding, and, as an instantaneous moment of re-alteration, must turn again to realize itself as that which the others already have become. In this condition each constituent of the alter-verse is called Myself-void-otherness, because it is void of otherness and always must be searching for its own constitution as the others of the environment. This constantly having to re-alter its ownmost constitution, each Myself-void-otherness experiences as time – identical for all constituents in such a primitive alter-verse.
So far we have been considering how time comes about from the prior state of Temporality of a fourfold alter-verse – a quadri-verse. But to enable us to consider what space is, we will have to show what constitutes that quadri-verse, and that’s what the next few video pages will be about. But we also must try to be more definite in the way we describe all these alter-versal environments of understanding. What I mean is, that we cannot simply go on referring to the others as constituencies of otherness. We will have to start naming them in accordance with their colours to be able to distinguish between them. So for example, the quadri-verse that we have been considering, which is by chance red, yellow, green and violet, we will call RYGV. This will enable us to consider the spatiality of space through the differences in the simplest possible environment of understanding – a tri-verse.
This naming is outlined in the following video. I also mention the idea of a Mythogrammic language – an ancient form that spells its symbols pluri-dimensionally. The important thing for us as we are considering these things, is for all constituents, not to be understood or implied, but visible as the constituents of under-standing. Therefore they are linguistially speaking, open symbols or mythograms.