11

By temporality I mean the entire, instantaneous array of Ourself which is constituted by actuations of under-standing. Temporality is my theoretical rationalization of the dynamics of understanding. Temporality is the way I grasp absolute singleness, and it is my construct for the manner in which understanding under-stands understanding. To wit, there can be no otherness beyond absolute singleness, which is why the the entire array is composed of inwardly accumulating alter-environments (Others) which are always grasped (bracketed) as increasingly complex instances of Ourself. So to emphasize the point, there can be no other which is exterior to the absolute singleness. But this is exactly what happens at each moment of actuation, inasmuch as (OURSELF) cannot grasp the manifold nature of its ownmost constitution as (OTHER OTHER OTHER)….  and instantly be-comes (MYSELF MYSELF MYSELF) or (Myself-void-otherness). But each of these MYSELFS is always already its ownmost (Myself-void-otherness), which is exactly what, as the ‘re-altered’ moment, each comprehends but does not under-stand. The constituents of this environment would agree that their ownmost constitutions had altered, which they would grasp as a moment of time having passed.

At any moment of re-alteration, Myself-void-otherness is always already be-coming its own singularity – an impossible ‘alter-state’ for the absolute singleness of understanding. Therefore, Myself-void-otherness is instantaneously conditioned to another re-alteration – the passing of another moment of its time. But no time has passed for absolute singleness. This conditioning takes the pattern of Myself always be-coming that which the others already are. . .